Literature cited
Curtis, D. J., Reid, N., & Ballard, G. (2012). Communicating Ecology Through Art: What Scientists Think. Ecology and Society, 17(2), art3. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04670-170203
Fensham, P. (2001). Science as Story: Science Education by Story. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 2(1).
Gonen, M., & Guler, T. (2011). The Environment and Its Place in Children’s Picture Story Books. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3633–3639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.347
Harrower, J., Parker, J., & Merson, M. (2018). Species Loss: Exploring Opportunities with Art–Science. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 58(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icy016
Jerome, L. W. (2019). Collaboration, Complexity and Innovation: The Stories We Tell Matter. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3449732
Madhusoodanan, J. (2016). Enlisting the help of an illustrator can add impact to research papers and outreach projects. Nature, 534, 285–286.
Moser, S. (2014). Making Expert Knowledge through the Image: Connections between Antiquarian and Early Modern Scientific Illustration. Isis, 105(1), 58–99. https://doi.org/10.1086/675551
Polletta, F., Chen, P. C. B., Gardner, B. G., & Motes, A. (2011). The Sociology of Storytelling. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150106
Pringle, R. M., & Lamme, L. L. (n.d.). Using Picture Storybooks to Support Young Children’s Science Learning. 16.
Tatalovic, M. (2009). Science comics as tools for science education and communication: A brief, exploratory study. Journal of Science Communication, 08(04). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.08040202
Waxman, S. R., Herrmann, P., Woodring, J., & Medin, D. L. (2014). Humans (really) are animals: Picture-book reading influences 5-year-old urban childrens construal of the relation between humans and non-human animals. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00172
Hsiao, C.-Y., & Shih, P.-Y. (2016). Exploring the effectiveness of picture books for teaching young children the concepts of environmental protection. International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education, 25(1), 36–49. https://doi-org.proxy.lib.miamioh.edu/10.1080/10382046.2015.1106203
Kudryavtsev, A., Stedman, R., & Krasny, M. (2012). Sense of place in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 18(2), 229–250. https://doi-org.proxy.lib.miamioh.edu/10.1080/13504622.2011.609615
Wamsler, C. (2019, May 16). How mindfulness can help the shift towards a more sustainable society. Retrieved November 19, 2020, from https://theconversation.com/how-mindfulness-can-help-the-shift-towards-a-more-sustainable-society-79127
Opermanis, O., Kalnins, S. N., & Aunins, A. (2015). Merging science and arts to communicate nature conservation. Journal for Nature Conservation, 28, 67–77.
Yenawine, P. (2019). Art in School: As Essential as Language. American Educator, 43(1), 22-27.
Sherman, A. & Morrissey, C. (2017). What Is Art Good For? The Socio-Epistemic Value of Art. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 11(411).
Abhijit, Bora. “Science Communication through Mass Media.” Research Journal of Recent Sciences 1 (2012): 6.
Bickford, D., Posa, M. R. C., Qie, L., Campos-Arceiz, A., & Kudavidanage, E. P. (2012). Science communication for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 151(1), 74-76.
Brossard, Dominique. “Media, Scientific Journals and Science Communication: Examining the Construction of Scientific Controversies.” Public Understanding of Science 18, no. 3 (May 2009): 258–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662507084398.
Bubela, Tania, Matthew C Nisbet, Rick Borchelt, Fern Brunger, Cristine Critchley, Edna Einsiedel, Gail Geller, et al. “Science Communication Reconsidered.” Nature Biotechnology 27, no. 6 (June 2009): 514–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0609-514.
Cook, C. N., Mascia, M. B., Schwartz, M. W., Possingham, H. P., & Fuller, R. A. (2013). Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge–action boundary. Conservation Biology, 27(4), 669-678.
Dietz, T. “Bringing Values and Deliberation to Science Communication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, no. Supplement_3 (August 20, 2013): 14081–87. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212740110.
Fischhoff, B. “The Sciences of Science Communication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, no. Supplement_3 (August 20, 2013): 14033–39. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213273110.
Funk, C., M. Hefferon, B. Kennedy, C. Johnson. 2019. Trust and mistrust in Americans’ views of scientific experts. Pew Research Center, Science & Society. Web.
Liang, Xuan, Leona Yi-Fan Su, Sara K. Yeo, Dietram A. Scheufele, Dominique Brossard, Michael Xenos, Paul Nealey, and Elizabeth A. Corley. “Building Buzz: (Scientists) Communicating Science in New Media Environments.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 91, no. 4 (December 2014): 772–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699014550092.
Moser, Stephanie. “Making Expert Knowledge through the Image: Connections between Antiquarian and Early Modern Scientific Illustration.” Isis 105, no. 1 (March 2014): 58–99. https://doi.org/10.1086/675551.
Nisbet, Matthew C., and Dietram A. Scheufele. “What’s next for Science Communication? Promising Directions and Lingering Distractions.” American Journal of Botany 96, no. 10 (October 2009): 1767–78. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041.
Scheufele, D. A. “Science Communication as Political Communication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, no. Supplement_4 (September 16, 2014): 13585–92. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317516111.
Smith, Karl U. “The Scientific Principles of Textbook Design and Illustration.” Educational Technology Research and Development 8, no. 1 (January 1960): 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02713372.
Abhijit, Bora. “Science Communication through Mass Media.” Research Journal of Recent Sciences 1 (2012): 6.
Bickford, D., Posa, M. R. C., Qie, L., Campos-Arceiz, A., & Kudavidanage, E. P. (2012). Science communication for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 151(1), 74-76.
Brossard, Dominique. “Media, Scientific Journals and Science Communication: Examining the Construction of Scientific Controversies.” Public Understanding of Science 18, no. 3 (May 2009): 258–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662507084398.
Bubela, Tania, Matthew C Nisbet, Rick Borchelt, Fern Brunger, Cristine Critchley, Edna Einsiedel, Gail Geller, et al. “Science Communication Reconsidered.” Nature Biotechnology 27, no. 6 (June 2009): 514–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0609-514.
Cook, C. N., Mascia, M. B., Schwartz, M. W., Possingham, H. P., & Fuller, R. A. (2013). Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge–action boundary. Conservation Biology, 27(4), 669-678.
Dietz, T. “Bringing Values and Deliberation to Science Communication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, no. Supplement_3 (August 20, 2013): 14081–87. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212740110.
Fischhoff, B. “The Sciences of Science Communication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, no. Supplement_3 (August 20, 2013): 14033–39. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213273110.
Ford, B. J. 2003. Scientific Illustration in the Eighteenth Century. Cardiff University, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Funk, C., M. Hefferon, B. Kennedy, C. Johnson. 2019. Trust and mistrust in Americans’ views of scientific experts. Pew Research Center, Science & Society. Web.
Liang, Xuan, Leona Yi-Fan Su, Sara K. Yeo, Dietram A. Scheufele, Dominique Brossard, Michael Xenos, Paul Nealey, and Elizabeth A. Corley. “Building Buzz: (Scientists) Communicating Science in New Media Environments.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 91, no. 4 (December 2014): 772–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699014550092.
Gibbons, W.J. & Andrews, K.M., (2004) PIT Tagging: Simple Technology at Its Best, BioScience 54 (5): 447–454, https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0447:PTSTAI]2.0.CO;2
Moser, Stephanie. “Making Expert Knowledge through the Image: Connections between Antiquarian and Early Modern Scientific Illustration.” Isis 105, no. 1 (March 2014): 58–99. https://doi.org/10.1086/675551.
Nisbet, Matthew C., and Dietram A. Scheufele. “What’s next for Science Communication? Promising Directions and Lingering Distractions.” American Journal of Botany 96, no. 10 (October 2009): 1767–78. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041.
Prentice , E. F., Flagg T. A., McCutcheon C. S., & Brastow D. F. (1990) PIT-Tag monitoring systems for hydroelectric dams and fish hatcheries. American Fisheries Society Symposium 7: 323-334.
Pyle, Cynthia M. “Art as Science: Scientific Illustration, 1490–1670 in Drawing, Woodcut and Copper Plate.” Endeavor 24, no. 2 (June 1, 2000): 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-9327(99)01262-4.
Scheufele, D. A. “Science Communication as Political Communication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, no. Supplement_4 (September 16, 2014): 13585–92. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317516111.
Smith, Karl U. “The Scientific Principles of Textbook Design and Illustration.” Educational Technology Research and Development 8, no. 1 (January 1960): 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02713372.
Smyth, B. & Nebel, S. (2013) Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) Tags in the Study of Animal Movement. Nature Education Knowledge 4(3):3
Svakhine, N., D.S. Ebert, and D. Stredney. “Illustration Motifs for Effective Medical Volume Illustration.” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 25, no. 3 (May 2005): 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2005.60.
Fensham, P. (2001). Science as Story: Science Education by Story. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 2(1).
Gonen, M., & Guler, T. (2011). The Environment and Its Place in Children’s Picture Story Books. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3633–3639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.347
Harrower, J., Parker, J., & Merson, M. (2018). Species Loss: Exploring Opportunities with Art–Science. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 58(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icy016
Jerome, L. W. (2019). Collaboration, Complexity and Innovation: The Stories We Tell Matter. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3449732
Madhusoodanan, J. (2016). Enlisting the help of an illustrator can add impact to research papers and outreach projects. Nature, 534, 285–286.
Moser, S. (2014). Making Expert Knowledge through the Image: Connections between Antiquarian and Early Modern Scientific Illustration. Isis, 105(1), 58–99. https://doi.org/10.1086/675551
Polletta, F., Chen, P. C. B., Gardner, B. G., & Motes, A. (2011). The Sociology of Storytelling. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150106
Pringle, R. M., & Lamme, L. L. (n.d.). Using Picture Storybooks to Support Young Children’s Science Learning. 16.
Tatalovic, M. (2009). Science comics as tools for science education and communication: A brief, exploratory study. Journal of Science Communication, 08(04). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.08040202
Waxman, S. R., Herrmann, P., Woodring, J., & Medin, D. L. (2014). Humans (really) are animals: Picture-book reading influences 5-year-old urban childrens construal of the relation between humans and non-human animals. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00172
Hsiao, C.-Y., & Shih, P.-Y. (2016). Exploring the effectiveness of picture books for teaching young children the concepts of environmental protection. International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education, 25(1), 36–49. https://doi-org.proxy.lib.miamioh.edu/10.1080/10382046.2015.1106203
Kudryavtsev, A., Stedman, R., & Krasny, M. (2012). Sense of place in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 18(2), 229–250. https://doi-org.proxy.lib.miamioh.edu/10.1080/13504622.2011.609615
Wamsler, C. (2019, May 16). How mindfulness can help the shift towards a more sustainable society. Retrieved November 19, 2020, from https://theconversation.com/how-mindfulness-can-help-the-shift-towards-a-more-sustainable-society-79127
Opermanis, O., Kalnins, S. N., & Aunins, A. (2015). Merging science and arts to communicate nature conservation. Journal for Nature Conservation, 28, 67–77.
Yenawine, P. (2019). Art in School: As Essential as Language. American Educator, 43(1), 22-27.
Sherman, A. & Morrissey, C. (2017). What Is Art Good For? The Socio-Epistemic Value of Art. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 11(411).
Abhijit, Bora. “Science Communication through Mass Media.” Research Journal of Recent Sciences 1 (2012): 6.
Bickford, D., Posa, M. R. C., Qie, L., Campos-Arceiz, A., & Kudavidanage, E. P. (2012). Science communication for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 151(1), 74-76.
Brossard, Dominique. “Media, Scientific Journals and Science Communication: Examining the Construction of Scientific Controversies.” Public Understanding of Science 18, no. 3 (May 2009): 258–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662507084398.
Bubela, Tania, Matthew C Nisbet, Rick Borchelt, Fern Brunger, Cristine Critchley, Edna Einsiedel, Gail Geller, et al. “Science Communication Reconsidered.” Nature Biotechnology 27, no. 6 (June 2009): 514–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0609-514.
Cook, C. N., Mascia, M. B., Schwartz, M. W., Possingham, H. P., & Fuller, R. A. (2013). Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge–action boundary. Conservation Biology, 27(4), 669-678.
Dietz, T. “Bringing Values and Deliberation to Science Communication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, no. Supplement_3 (August 20, 2013): 14081–87. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212740110.
Fischhoff, B. “The Sciences of Science Communication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, no. Supplement_3 (August 20, 2013): 14033–39. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213273110.
Funk, C., M. Hefferon, B. Kennedy, C. Johnson. 2019. Trust and mistrust in Americans’ views of scientific experts. Pew Research Center, Science & Society. Web.
Liang, Xuan, Leona Yi-Fan Su, Sara K. Yeo, Dietram A. Scheufele, Dominique Brossard, Michael Xenos, Paul Nealey, and Elizabeth A. Corley. “Building Buzz: (Scientists) Communicating Science in New Media Environments.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 91, no. 4 (December 2014): 772–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699014550092.
Moser, Stephanie. “Making Expert Knowledge through the Image: Connections between Antiquarian and Early Modern Scientific Illustration.” Isis 105, no. 1 (March 2014): 58–99. https://doi.org/10.1086/675551.
Nisbet, Matthew C., and Dietram A. Scheufele. “What’s next for Science Communication? Promising Directions and Lingering Distractions.” American Journal of Botany 96, no. 10 (October 2009): 1767–78. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041.
Scheufele, D. A. “Science Communication as Political Communication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, no. Supplement_4 (September 16, 2014): 13585–92. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317516111.
Smith, Karl U. “The Scientific Principles of Textbook Design and Illustration.” Educational Technology Research and Development 8, no. 1 (January 1960): 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02713372.
Abhijit, Bora. “Science Communication through Mass Media.” Research Journal of Recent Sciences 1 (2012): 6.
Bickford, D., Posa, M. R. C., Qie, L., Campos-Arceiz, A., & Kudavidanage, E. P. (2012). Science communication for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 151(1), 74-76.
Brossard, Dominique. “Media, Scientific Journals and Science Communication: Examining the Construction of Scientific Controversies.” Public Understanding of Science 18, no. 3 (May 2009): 258–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662507084398.
Bubela, Tania, Matthew C Nisbet, Rick Borchelt, Fern Brunger, Cristine Critchley, Edna Einsiedel, Gail Geller, et al. “Science Communication Reconsidered.” Nature Biotechnology 27, no. 6 (June 2009): 514–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0609-514.
Cook, C. N., Mascia, M. B., Schwartz, M. W., Possingham, H. P., & Fuller, R. A. (2013). Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge–action boundary. Conservation Biology, 27(4), 669-678.
Dietz, T. “Bringing Values and Deliberation to Science Communication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, no. Supplement_3 (August 20, 2013): 14081–87. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212740110.
Fischhoff, B. “The Sciences of Science Communication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, no. Supplement_3 (August 20, 2013): 14033–39. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213273110.
Ford, B. J. 2003. Scientific Illustration in the Eighteenth Century. Cardiff University, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Funk, C., M. Hefferon, B. Kennedy, C. Johnson. 2019. Trust and mistrust in Americans’ views of scientific experts. Pew Research Center, Science & Society. Web.
Liang, Xuan, Leona Yi-Fan Su, Sara K. Yeo, Dietram A. Scheufele, Dominique Brossard, Michael Xenos, Paul Nealey, and Elizabeth A. Corley. “Building Buzz: (Scientists) Communicating Science in New Media Environments.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 91, no. 4 (December 2014): 772–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699014550092.
Gibbons, W.J. & Andrews, K.M., (2004) PIT Tagging: Simple Technology at Its Best, BioScience 54 (5): 447–454, https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0447:PTSTAI]2.0.CO;2
Moser, Stephanie. “Making Expert Knowledge through the Image: Connections between Antiquarian and Early Modern Scientific Illustration.” Isis 105, no. 1 (March 2014): 58–99. https://doi.org/10.1086/675551.
Nisbet, Matthew C., and Dietram A. Scheufele. “What’s next for Science Communication? Promising Directions and Lingering Distractions.” American Journal of Botany 96, no. 10 (October 2009): 1767–78. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041.
Prentice , E. F., Flagg T. A., McCutcheon C. S., & Brastow D. F. (1990) PIT-Tag monitoring systems for hydroelectric dams and fish hatcheries. American Fisheries Society Symposium 7: 323-334.
Pyle, Cynthia M. “Art as Science: Scientific Illustration, 1490–1670 in Drawing, Woodcut and Copper Plate.” Endeavor 24, no. 2 (June 1, 2000): 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-9327(99)01262-4.
Scheufele, D. A. “Science Communication as Political Communication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, no. Supplement_4 (September 16, 2014): 13585–92. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317516111.
Smith, Karl U. “The Scientific Principles of Textbook Design and Illustration.” Educational Technology Research and Development 8, no. 1 (January 1960): 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02713372.
Smyth, B. & Nebel, S. (2013) Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) Tags in the Study of Animal Movement. Nature Education Knowledge 4(3):3
Svakhine, N., D.S. Ebert, and D. Stredney. “Illustration Motifs for Effective Medical Volume Illustration.” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 25, no. 3 (May 2005): 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2005.60.